Journal of Medical Physics
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2022  |  Volume : 47  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 10--19

Dosimetric influence of acuros XB dose-to-medium and dose-to-water reporting modes on carcinoma cervix using intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric rapidarc technique


Lalit Kumar1, Manindra Bhushan3, Vimal Kishore2, Rahul Lal Chowdhary4, Soumitra Barik4, Anurag Sharma3, Munish Gairola5 
1 Department of Applied Science and Humanities, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh; Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Physics, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Applied Science and Humanities, Bundelkhand Institute of Engineering and Technology, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India
3 Department of Research, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Lalit Kumar
Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Physics, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Sector-5, Rohini, New Delhi - 110 085
India

Aim: We aimed to evaluate the dosimetric influence of Acuros XB (AXB) dose-to-medium (Dm) and dose-to-water (Dw) reporting mode on carcinoma cervix using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and RapidArc (RA) technique. Materials and Methods: A cohort of thirty patients cared for carcinoma cervix was retrospectively selected for the study. Plans were computed using analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA), AXB-Dm, and AXB-Dw algorithms for dosimetric comparison. A paired t-test and Pitman–Morgan dispersion test were executed to appraise the difference in mean values and the inter-patient variability of the differences. Results: The dose–volume parameters were higher for AXB-Dw in contrast to AAA for IMRT and RA plans, excluding D98%, minimum dose to planning target volume (PTV) and rectum mean dose (RA). There was no systematic trend observed in dose–volume parameters for PTV and organs at risk (OARs) between AXB-Dm and AXB-Dw for IMRT and RA plans. The dose–volume parameters for target were higher for AXB-Dm in comparison to AAA in IMRT and RA plans, except D98% and minimum dose to PTV. Analysis envisaged less inter-patient variability while switching from AAA to AXB-Dm in comparison to those switching from AAA to AXB-Dw. Conclusions: The present study reveals the important difference between AAA, AXB-Dm, and AXB-Dw computations for cervix carcinoma using IMRT and RA techniques. The inter-patient variability and systematic difference in dose–volume parameters computed using AAA, AXB-Dm, and AXB-Dw algorithms present the possible impact on the dose prescription to PTV and their relative constraints to OARs for IMRT and RA techniques. This may help in the decision-making in clinic while switching from AAA to AXB (Dm or Dw) algorithm for cervix carcinoma using IMRT and RA techniques.


How to cite this article:
Kumar L, Bhushan M, Kishore V, Chowdhary RL, Barik S, Sharma A, Gairola M. Dosimetric influence of acuros XB dose-to-medium and dose-to-water reporting modes on carcinoma cervix using intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric rapidarc technique.J Med Phys 2022;47:10-19


How to cite this URL:
Kumar L, Bhushan M, Kishore V, Chowdhary RL, Barik S, Sharma A, Gairola M. Dosimetric influence of acuros XB dose-to-medium and dose-to-water reporting modes on carcinoma cervix using intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric rapidarc technique. J Med Phys [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 May 22 ];47:10-19
Available from: https://www.jmp.org.in/article.asp?issn=0971-6203;year=2022;volume=47;issue=1;spage=10;epage=19;aulast=Kumar;type=0