Journal of Medical Physics
 Home | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscription | Login  The official journal of AMPI, IOMP and AFOMP      
 Users online: 1326  Home  EMail this page Print this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 47  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 315-321

Magnetic resonance imaging image-based segmentation of brain tumor using the modified transfer learning method


1 Department of Physics, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh; Department of Radiation Oncology, Lady Hardinge Medical College and Associated Hospitals, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Physics, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India
3 Department of Radiotherapy, SN Medical College, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India

Correspondence Address:
Mr. Sandeep Singh
Department of Radiation Oncology, Lady Harding Medical College, New Delhi - 110 001
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_52_22

Rights and Permissions

Purpose: The goal of this study was to improve overall brain tumor segmentation (BraTS) accuracy. In this study, a form of convolutional neural network called three-dimensional (3D) U-Net was utilized to segment various tumor regions on brain 3D magnetic resonance imaging images using a transfer learning technique. Materials and Methods: The dataset used for this study was obtained from the multimodal BraTS challenge. The total number of studies was 2240, obtained from BraTS 2018, BraTS 2019, BraTS 2020, and BraTS 2021 challenges, and each study had five series: T1, contrast-enhanced-T1, Flair, T2, and segmented mask file (seg), all in Neuroimaging Informatics Technology Initiative (NIFTI) format. The proposed method employs a 3D U-Net that was trained separately on each of the four datasets by transferring weights across them. Results: The overall training accuracy, validation accuracy, mean dice coefficient, and mean intersection over union achieved were 99.35%, 98.93%, 0.9875%, and 0.8738%, respectively. Conclusion: The proposed method for tumor segmentation outperforms the existing method.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed551    
    Printed22    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded118    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal