| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2010 | Volume
: 35
| Issue : 4 | Page : 215-222 |
|
|
Experimental determination of the weighting factor for the energy window subtraction-based downscatter correction for I-123 in brain SPECT studies
Robin de Nijs1, Søren Holm1, Gerda Thomsen2, Morten Ziebell2, Claus Svarer2
1 Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, PET and Cyclotron Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
2 Neurobiology Research Unit, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
Correspondence Address:
Robin de Nijs
Department of Clinical Physiology & Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cyclotron Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, KF 4011, Blegdamsvej 9, DK - 2100, Copenhagen
Denmark
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.71765
|
|
|
Correction for downscatter in I-123 SPECT can be performed by the subtraction of a secondary energy window from the main window, as in the triple-energy window method. This is potentially noise sensitive. For studies with limited amount of counts (e.g. dynamic studies), a broad subtraction window with identical width is preferred. This secondary window needs to be weighted with a factor higher than one, due to a broad backscatter peak from high-energy photons appearing at 172 keV. Spatial dependency and the numerical value of this weighting factor and the image contrast improvement of this correction were investigated in this study. Energy windows with a width of 32 keV were centered at 159 keV and 200 keV. The weighting factor was measured both with an I-123 point source and in a dopamine transporter brain SPECT study in 10 human subjects (5 healthy subjects and 5 patients) by minimizing the background outside the head. Weighting factors ranged from 1.11 to 1.13 for the point source and from 1.16 to 1.18 for human subjects. Point source measurements revealed no position dependence. After correction, the measured specific binding ratio (image contrast) increased significantly for healthy subjects, typically by more than 20%, while the background counts outside of all subjects were effectively removed. A weighting factor of 1.1-1.2 can be applied in clinical practice. This correction effectively removes downscatter and significantly improves image contrast inside the brain. |
|
|
|
| [FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|
