Journal of Medical Physics
 Home | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscription | Login  The official journal of AMPI, IOMP and AFOMP      
 Users online: 896  Home  EMail this page Print this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size 


 
EDITORIAL
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 35  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 63-64
 

CyberKnife: A new paradigm in radiotherapy


Apollo Speciality Hospital, 320, Mount Road, Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035, India

Date of Web Publication3-Apr-2010

Correspondence Address:
Gopalakrishna Kurup
Apollo Speciality Hospital, 320, Mount Road, Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.62194

Rights and Permissions

 



How to cite this article:
Kurup G. CyberKnife: A new paradigm in radiotherapy. J Med Phys 2010;35:63-4

How to cite this URL:
Kurup G. CyberKnife: A new paradigm in radiotherapy. J Med Phys [serial online] 2010 [cited 2022 Sep 30];35:63-4. Available from: https://www.jmp.org.in/text.asp?2010/35/2/63/62194


CyberKnife is a stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) system. SRS is a combination of principles of stereotaxy, or three-dimensional target localization, and radiation beams from multiple directions cross-firing the tumor precisely. Due to the high degree of precision, it is possible to deliver very high dose of radiation to the target with minimal damage to the normal tissues and structures surrounding the tumor. The ideal aim is to ablate the tumor with high radiation dose noninvasively. It has been proved to be an effective alternative to surgery for small tumors and selected medical conditions.

The concept of radiosurgery was developed and put into practice by Dr. Lars Leksell, a Swedish neurosurgeon, in early 1950s. [1] A new device was developed exclusively for radiosurgery with the help of approximately 201 numbers of pencil-type Co-60 sources focused on the region of abnormal brain tissues. These sources were spherically distributed in a helmet around the skull, which is fitted onto the patient's head, and the system is called Gamma Knife. [2] With this system, a relatively spherical dose focused around the target volume, with minimal dose to the surrounding normal cells, could be delivered. The limitation of the Gamma Knife is mainly in its usability outside the head, even though the new generation of Gamma Knife can treat tumors up to C2 vertebra level.

The 'linear accelerator'-based radiosurgery was pioneered in the mid-1980s. These systems differ from the original Gamma Knife system in many ways. 6-MV x-rays produced from linear accelerator are used in these systems, instead of gamma rays from Co-60 sources. All these systems were used in conjunction with a stereotactic frame fixed onto the skull of the patient. Three-dimensional coordinates of the tumor were precisely determined by the stereotactic frame, and the radiation was delivered accurately to the target volume. Small circular collimators fitted at the end of the treatment head as tresiary collimators were used for narrowing the beam of x-rays from a conventional linear accelerator. Subsequently mini-multileaf collimator (MMLC) replacing the circular collimators enhanced the stereotactic procedures by way of treating irregular lesions in the brain. All these systems require a stereotactic frame to be fixed onto the patient's head, right from imaging to treatment, and hence are termed as invasive or minimally invasive procedures. These methods of conformal dose delivery to the target reduce radiation dose to the surrounding normal tissues substantially. [3],[4]

The CyberKnife concept, invented by Dr. John Adler, a neurosurgeon in Stanford, USA, came into practice by 1990s. [5],[6] A lightweight linear accelerator fitted onto an industrial robot makes treatment possible precisely in a desired way. The robotic arm has 6 degrees of freedom of movement; unlike the conventional linear accelerator, which has only rotational movement in one plane. CyberKnife treatments are non-isocentric, where beams can be directed from any desired angle. This system does not require a rigid frame to be fixed onto the skull of the patient for stereotactic setup and verification. Initially the CyberKnife was put into use for treatment of only intracranial lesions, like other stereotactic systems. [4] Subsequent developments made it possible to extend the facility to extracranial lesions also, thereby making it a whole-body stereotactic radiotherapy system.

One should understand how the CyberKnife is different from other stereotactic radiosurgery systems. There are a few unique features in CyberKnife to track the tumor precisely and deliver radiation accurately as desired. [7] Unlike other linac-based systems, which have accuracy in millimeters, the CyberKnife has sub-millimeter accuracy in tracking tumor position. If sub-millimeter accuracy is not achieved, it gives warning and stops treatment. The orthogonal x-ray images are taken before each beam and verified for accuracy.

There are 5 different tumor-tracking facilities in CyberKnife treatment. They are 6D skull, fiducial, X sight spine, X sight lung with synchrony, and fiducial with synchrony. These tracking methods are used in different types of sites and with various natures of the organ to be treated. 6D skull tracking is used only for intracranial lesions. Fiducial tracking can be used for any other site. The synchrony tracking feature is used for tracking any moving target in a phased manner with breathing cycles. [8],[9] Unlike other systems, where treatment is given on a certain fixed phase of breathing (gated therapy), with synchrony method, the robot can move in synchrony with chest movement during breathing and deliver radiation without interruption as if the tumor is locked to the beam.

Now, the CyberKnife, with its advanced technologies and complexities, gives maximum flexibility in its use to treat any lesion in any part of the body noninvasively. The CyberKnife also has limitations. One of the major limitations is the prolonged treatment time: approximately 30 to 60 minutes. This does not alter the accuracy, because of repeated verifications before each beam delivery. Large volumes are not suitable with CyberKnife as the principle of delivery is 'dose painting' from one edge of the tumor to the other. This is most suitable for recurrent and residual tumors after prior radiotherapy treatments. Other than brain lesions, small tumors in lung, liver and spine can be effectively treated using CyberKnife.

A high degree of understanding and training is essential and is emphasized before the system is put to use in clinical practice by any center. The team consisting of radiation oncologists, medical physicists and technologists should understand the principle and technological features of the CyberKnife. Clinicians should understand the tumor biology of short-course treatment with high dose/ fraction; physicists should know the accuracy and dose-delivery principles; and technologists should know the principles, the accuracy desired and achievable and consequences of errors corrected/ liberalized and their impact on treatment delivery.

 
   References Top

1.Leksell L. An historical vignette. Radiosurgery: Baseline and Trends. New York: Raven Press; 1992. p. 257-61.  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.Leksell L. Stereotaxis and radiosurgery: An operative system. Springfield: Charles C Thomson 1971.  Back to cited text no. 2      
3.Kim MC, Kang JK, Song JU. Preliminary experience in stereotactic radiosurgery with the linear accelerator. Proc.9 th Jun Conf Neurology Surg. New Delhi, India: 1989. p. 141.  Back to cited text no. 3      
4.Colombo F, Benedetti A, Zamardo A, Pozza F, Avanzo R, Chierego G, et al. New technique for three-dimentional linear accelerator radiosurgery. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1987;39:38-40.  Back to cited text no. 4      
5.Adler JR. Frameless radiosurgery. Stereotactic surgery and radiosurgery madison. Medical Physics Publication; 1993. p. 237-48.  Back to cited text no. 5      
6.Adler JR, Cox RS Preliminary experience with CyberKnife - Radiosurgery. Basel: S.Karger; 1996. p. 112-38.  Back to cited text no. 6      
7.Adler JR Jr, Murphy MJ, Chang SD, Hancock SL. Image guided robotic radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 1999;44:1299-307.  Back to cited text no. 7      
8.Adler JR. Introduction and overview: CyberKnife radiosurgery: A practical guide. The CyberKnife Society 2005.p.8-9  Back to cited text no. 8      
9.Coste Manere E, Olender D, Kelby W, Schelz RA. Robotic whole body stereotactic radiosurgery: Clinical advantage of CyberKnife "Integrated system. Int J Med Robot 2005:2:28-39.  Back to cited text no. 9      



This article has been cited by
1 Dosimetric comparison of Synchrony® real-time motion tracking treatment plans between CyberKnife robotic radiosurgery and Radixact system for stereotactic body radiation therapy of lung and prostate cancer
C.W. Kong, T.L. Chiu, H. Geng, W.W. Lam, B. Yang, C.W. Cheung, S.K. Yu
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice. 2022; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 A feasibility study on the development and use of a deep learning model to automate real-time monitoring of tumor position and assessment of interfraction fiducial marker migration in prostate radiotherapy patients *
Ryan Motley, Prabhakar Ramachandran, Andrew Fielding
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express. 2022; 8(3): 035009
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 CyberKnife stere otactic radiotherapy for treatment of primary intracranial tumors in dogs
Gabrielle L. Carter, Gregory K. Ogilvie, Lenore A. Mohammadian, Phillip J. Bergman, Rachel P. Lee, David R. Proulx
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 2021; 35(3): 1480
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Selection of the Accelerating Structure of a Small Linear Electron Accelerator for Radiotherapy
S. V. Kutsaev
Instruments and Experimental Techniques. 2021; 64(6): 869
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Erken Evre Meme Kanserli Hastalarda Hizlandirilmis Kismi Meme Isinlamasinda VMAT-CyberKnife Sanal Tedavi Planlarinin Incelenmesi
Hidayetül Mediha KILIÇ, Sibel KAHRAMAN ÇETINTAS, Mehmet TOSUN, Metin ZORLUTUNA, Sema Gözcü TUNÇ
Uludag Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Cyberknife Radiosurgery for the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review
Cristalle Soman, Shahad Ramzi Mohammed Alghamdi, Faisal Nahar M. Alazemi, Abdulaziz Ahmad Abdullah Alghamdi
European Journal of Dentistry. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Dosimetric feasibility of hypofractionation for SBRT treatment of lymph node oligometastases on the 1.5T MR-linac
Dennis Winkel, Anita M. Werensteijn-Honingh, Wietse S.C. Eppinga, Martijn P.W. Intven, Jochem Hes, Louk M.W. Snoeren, Sanne A. Visser, Gijsbert H. Bol, Bas W. Raaymakers, Ina M. Jürgenliemk-Schulz, Petra S. Kroon
Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2021; 154: 243
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Compact X-Band electron linac for radiotherapy and security applications
S.V. Kutsaev, R. Agustsson, A. Arodzero, R. Berry, A. Bezhanov, S. Boucher, O. Chimalpopoca, A. Diego, L. Faillace, D. Gavryushkin, M. Harrison, J.J. Hartzell, J. McNevin, M. Ruelas, A. Yu Smirnov, A. Verma, K. Woods
Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2021; 185: 109494
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Non-invasive ablation of arrhythmias with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy
John Whitaker, Raymond H. Mak, Paul C. Zei
Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Mitigation on bowel loops daily variations by 1.5-T MR-guided daily-adaptive SBRT for abdomino-pelvic lymph-nodal oligometastases
Francesco Cuccia, Michele Rigo, Davide Gurrera, Luca Nicosia, Rosario Mazzola, Vanessa Figlia, Niccolò Giaj-Levra, Francesco Ricchetti, Giorgio Attinà, Edoardo Pastorello, Antonio De Simone, Stefania Naccarato, Gianluisa Sicignano, Ruggero Ruggieri, Filippo Alongi
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 2021; 147(11): 3269
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 The safety and efficacy of Cyberknife® for thymic malignancy
C. Xu, J. Sun, W. Zhang, Z. Yuan, J. Wang
Cancer/Radiothérapie. 2021; 25(2): 119
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 High Quality Clinical Stereotactic Radiosurgery Planning and Delivery With Standard Resolution (5 mm) Multileaf Collimation and Multiple Isocenters
Maxwell Robinson, Clare Tunstall, Frank Van den Heuvel, Claire Hobbs, Sriram Padmanaban
Practical Radiation Oncology. 2020; 10(4): 293
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 Tumor phase recognition using cone-beam computed tomography projections and external surrogate information
Pingfang Tsai, Guanghua Yan, Chihray Liu, Ying-Chao Hung, Darren L. Kahler, Ji-Yeon Park, Nick Potter, Jonathan G. Li, Bo Lu
Medical Physics. 2020; 47(10): 5077
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
14 Noninvasive Radioablation of Ventricular Tachycardia
Ammar M. Athar, Christopher C. Nabors, Kartik Dhaduk, Srikanth Yandrapalli, Anant Jain, Chitti R. Moorthy, Edward C. Halperin, Sei Iwai, William H. Frishman, Jason Jacobson
Cardiology in Review. 2020; 28(6): 283
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
15 Development of a 6DOF robotic motion phantom for radiation therapy
Andrew H. Belcher,Xinmin Liu,Zachary Grelewicz,Erik Pearson,Rodney D. Wiersma
Medical Physics. 2014; 41(12): 121704
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
16 Clinical observation on the efficacy of CyberKnife for primary or metastatic retroperitoneal tumours
H-Q. Zhuang,Z-Y. Yuan,Y-C. Song,J. Wang,L-J. Zhao,P. Wang
European Journal of Cancer Care. 2013; : n/a
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
17 Highlights and pitfalls of 20 years of application of computerised glow curve analysis to thermoluminescence research and dosimetry
Y. S. Horowitz,M. Moscovitch
Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2013; 153(1): 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
18 A phantom study to determine the optimum size of a single collimator for shortening the treatment time in cyberknife stereotactic radiosurgery of spherical targets
Harikrishnaperumal, S., Kurup, G., Venkatraman, M., Jagadeesan, V.
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. 2012; 13(5): 33-45
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

 
   Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (517 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5102    
    Printed196    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded723    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 18    

Recommend this journal