|Year : 2008 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 29-34
Pediatric radiography entrance doses for some routine procedures in three hospitals within eastern Nigeria
NO Egbe1, SO Inyang2, OB Ibeagwa1, NO Chiaghanam1
1 Department of Radiography, University of Calabar, Nigeria
2 Department of Physics, University of Calabar, Nigeria
|Date of Submission||27-Apr-2007|
|Date of Acceptance||11-Oct-2007|
N O Egbe
Department of Radiography, University of Calabar
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
A survey of the entrance surface doses in the routine radiography of children in eastern Nigeria has been carried out in three hospitals, using thermoluminescence detectors. Chest, abdomen, lumbar spine, skull and pelvis were covered in this study. Findings reveal that doses are higher than the recommended reference values elsewhere, as well as values reported for Sudan. The mean percentage difference in entrance doses for chest radiography for this study and an earlier one carried out for three hospitals in the west of Nigeria is about 44.7%. The high doses are traceable to a lack of standardization in procedure, resulting in use of low tube voltages and high currents for examination, as well as the status of facilities in the area. Recommendations are made for immediate corrective measures to lower the doses.
Keywords: Entrance surface dose, exposure, kilovoltage, pediatric, radiography
|How to cite this article:|
Egbe N O, Inyang S O, Ibeagwa O B, Chiaghanam N O. Pediatric radiography entrance doses for some routine procedures in three hospitals within eastern Nigeria. J Med Phys 2008;33:29-34
|How to cite this URL:|
Egbe N O, Inyang S O, Ibeagwa O B, Chiaghanam N O. Pediatric radiography entrance doses for some routine procedures in three hospitals within eastern Nigeria. J Med Phys [serial online] 2008 [cited 2022 Jun 28];33:29-34. Available from: https://www.jmp.org.in/text.asp?2008/33/1/29/39422
| Introduction|| |
Clinical procedures in radiography utilize radiation exposures given at different rates. Effects of ionizing radiation on human tissue necessitate the development of strategies for radiation protection in all fields of human endeavor. The International Commission for Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommends that medical activities involving ionizing radiation should fulfill the two basic principles of justification and optimization. , One of the requirements of the optimization process is regular periodic monitoring of the performance of radiological equipment and assessment of techniques employed in their use. The focus of such monitoring serves to maintain standards, once developed, in equipment performance, image quality and, very importantly, patient doses. It seeks to establish values of measured quantities above which corrective action needs to be taken.  Radiation protection of the patient is so highly priced that several regulatory bodies have carried out studies leading to establishment of standards and regulations to guide its practice. ,,,, In Nigeria, local legislation has recently given impetus to the regularization of this practice. 
Entrance surface exposures (ESE) have been used to report patient doses, and this has been studied for both adult and pediatric patients in many parts of the world. ,,,,, Nigeria has not recorded similar evidence of research in patient radiation concerns, especially with regards to children, who have greater susceptibility to radiation effects. , Entrance skin doses (ESDs) have been reported for some radiological procedures for the adult Nigerian patient. ,, These studies are however not widespread, perhaps due to high cost involved in covering the entire country, the lack of adequate monitoring facilities and the generally low level of interest among users of ionizing radiation.
There is paucity of information on pediatric ESDs in the country. To the best of our knowledge, the only existing evidence of any study in this regard  is as limited in spread as the preceding adult studies, probably for the reasons earlier stated. This study faced the same logistic problems, for which reason it was limited to the southeastern block of Nigeria, covering three tertiary hospitals with X-ray facilities for general-purpose radiography. All three are major centers of medical activity, but none of them has dedicated facilities for pediatric radiology examinations. The hospitals - the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital (UCTH), Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital (NAUTH) and the Federal Medical Centre (FMC), Owerri - are all located in state capitals within the southeastern block of Nigeria.
The study is the first attempt at measuring ESDs in children in the area of study and will, with the information obtained earlier,  add to the pool of data available in national records for general use. It will provide guidance on where efforts on dose reduction will need to be directed to fulfill the requirements of the optimization process and serve as a reference for future work, as well as provide information for comparison with patients of the same category in other countries.
| Materials and Methods|| |
One hundred ninety-five children between the ages of 1 day and 12 years who presented in the hospitals for radiological examination were monitored in the study, using Lithium Fluoride thermoluminescent dosemeter (LiF TLD -100) phosphors for dose measurement. Summary of the radiographic equipment, patient distribution, as well as the average radiographic parameters recorded in each hospital for respective examinations, are as given in [Table - 1],[Table - 2] respectively. There was no information or record of quality checks on any of the facilities used in this study. The output of each unit could not be determined as there was no ionization chamber available. The survey was carried out despite this because the aim was to obtain data of entrance surface doses in the area. The commonest routine examinations which exclude the use of contrast media were investigated in the study. The number of patients monitored for each region examined came to 99, 15, 17, 34 and 30 for chest (AP/PA), abdomen (AP), lumbar spine (AP), skull (AP/lateral) and pelvis (AP) respectively. Three TLD chips were attached to the skin of each patient on the path of the primary X-ray beam for all examinations.
LiF TLD disks (0.3 mm thick) were calibrated for sensitivity and linearity at the Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory of the Federal Radiation Protection Services (FRPS), Ibadan. Calibration was done with known doses of X-rays at kVp 50-100, in 5 kVp steps, to obtain a calibration factor used to convert thermoluminesecence (TL) intensity to dose. Irradiated TLDs were read with a Vinten Solaro Model 680 reader at the same place. The mean deviation between the detectors was ±5%. The TL detectors were placed in radioparent cellophane bags with negligible radiation attenuation property to prevent accumulation of dirt and grease from handling. Dose output and reproducibility of the X-ray units, tested with TLDs over five exposures at 65 kVp and 12 mAs, preceded ESD collation. ESDs were obtained by placing the TLD discs at the center of the X-ray beam incident on the patients' skin. ESDs determined in this study were compared with values reported in literature for three hospitals in another region of Nigeria, as well as in published data for some hospitals in Sudan.
| Results|| |
Sample sizes in some examinations were very small (<10), as shown in [Table - 3]. However, doses for such examinations are reported because of the difficulty in obtaining sufficient number of patients for each category. Despite the high level of error introduced by these small samples, the doses are reported because this work is the first attempt at estimating effective doses in the area of study, and it is therefore believed that the data is essential for comparison with future measurements.
The range of doses recorded for tube output and reproducibility were 0.15-0.17 (FMC), 1.48-1.89 (NAUTH) and 1.69-1.98 (UCTH) for the same exposure factors and using the same TLD discs over the five exposures.
ESD values obtained are shown in [Table - 4]. As reported elsewhere, there were significant differences in the values obtained for the different hospitals, for the same examinations and same age range of the patients. Differences also exist for data for the same examination within the same hospital. The results are reported for different age ranges and sex [Table - 4] for X-ray projection monitored in each hospital.
ESDs were the highest in UCTH for patients aged 1-10 years presenting for chest and skull radiography respectively. Doses recorded for the age range 0-1 year were higher for UCTH than doses in the other two hospitals for pelvis. Abdominal doses for ages 1-5 and 5-10 in UCTH were very much higher than the values reported in literature. , The applied technique needs to be examined.
Distribution of the ESDs according to gender shows that in most cases, as presented in [Table - 5], there were differences in the values obtained between male and female patients within the same hospital and for the same examinations. Generally, ESDs for the female patients were higher than their male counterparts. No reason was given by the radiographers for this disparity. This is currently being further investigated. However, differences in technique by individual operators, as well as differences in patient body mass index (due to age range divisions used), may contribute to this.
| Discussion|| |
The purpose of any radiological procedure is ultimately to achieve the well-being of the patient. Children undergoing X-ray examination in three hospitals in eastern Nigeria were monitored to obtain the entrance surface doses for the commonest and most frequent examinations in the hospitals. The higher life expectancy of the child patient makes it necessary to ensure optimization in the procedures used. This survey has revealed high ESDs in the area of study.
[Figure - 1] is a comparison of the results of this study with those of the study by Ogundare et al. ;  and with data from United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR)  for chest, abdomen and skull radiographic projections in children. Generally, the high values of ESDs obtained are in agreement with the results from an earlier work covering three hospitals in the western part of Nigeria. 
ESDs for chest radiography in children, recorded in this work are higher than the values obtained in reference  by about 36.6% for ages 0-1 year, 47.5% for ages 1-5 years and 50% for ages 5-10 years respectively. The mean percentage difference in ESD for chest radiography for these two studies is about 44.7%. For the abdominal radiographs, the results from this study are higher than those reported earlier by 28.6% for age group 0-1 year. ESDs for skull films were 65.1% (for 1-5 years) and 29.8% (for 5-10 years) higher than those reported in the cited work.  However, lower ESDs were recorded for the abdominal examinations of age groups 5-10 years and 10-15 years, as well as for skull examinations of children aged between 0 and 1 year in the current study. These results show pediatric doses in the area of study to be higher than the values obtained in western Nigeria. The ESDs are also above values obtained in the three hospitals in Sudan,  as well as the reference levels recommended by the National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB)  and UNSCEAR.  One reason for this difference may be due to the influence of the Federal Radiation Protection Service, cited in the west, on hospitals within that catchment area. Widespread coverage of the activities of this institution is hampered by several factors, including lack of sufficient manpower, adequate equipment and logistics arising from other economic and political problems. It is hoped that the recent establishment of the Nigerian Institute for Radiation Protection and Research (NIRPR) will raise the profile of radiation protection and facilitate the necessary evolution of dosimetric reference parameters for the country.
The obtaining of high ESDs is attributed to the use of low kilovolts; and in the case of UCTH and NAUTH, very high milliampere-second (mAs) values [Table - 2]. The state of some of the equipment used in the departments is a source of concern. Apart from FMC, which has relatively new equipment, the other facilities studied have an average age greater than 15 years. Emission of soft radiation during the pre-contact phase in old generators is common and can add to the ESD, especially in the absence of added filtration. Additional tube filtration is not used in any of the hospitals, despite the fact that all the X-ray units have relatively low inherent tube filtration. The wide range of doses obtained for tube reproducibility may be an indication of a lack of accuracy of either kVp meter or timer in UCTH and NAUTH units. Testing of these units with appropriate equipment has been recommended to confirm accuracy as this may be a major contributor to the high doses recorded in these centers.
The wide variation in doses obtained for patients within the same hospital for similar examinations is the result of lack of any form of standardization in the procedures. There are therefore as many techniques as there are different radiographers in any one system. There is also no evidence of quality control checks on the X-ray generators to determine their level of reproducibility. Urgent attention needs to be paid to these concerns. Film processing conditions could also be a reason for the high doses. The lack of sensitometric studies for the manual processing techniques in the three hospitals often tells on the quality of radiographs produced, with radiographers sometimes having to compensate for weak processing solutions by increasing exposure factors.
While these results may not be the position of all diagnostic centers across the country, the findings suggest that very urgent steps need to be taken to address dose reduction in the three hospitals. Optimization of dose or resetting the exposure parameters so that minimum possible dose may be delivered to patients without compromising the image quality is urgently recommended in the centers recording the highest doses.
For this, quality assurance (QA) programs must be set up and executed on regular basis. This has been shown to have significant effect in reducing doses and improving image quality.  It is hoped that the NIRPR will facilitate increased intra-/inter-hospital surveys and monitoring of doses and subsequently develop radiation protection reference dose levels for the country. This work will serve as a starting point for dose monitoring in the region surveyed.
| Conclusion|| |
ESD measurements on children undergoing radiological examinations in three Nigerian hospitals show doses very much higher than recommended values. There is therefore urgent need to cut these doses. To this end, the generally practiced high kilovoltage technique and lower mAs are recommended, along with a change in the speed of the intensifying screens and films used. The development of a QA program to address the lapses in equipment and technical performance, either centrally or in each hospital, will go a long way in reducing ESDs in these hospitals, which will be evident from future monitoring.
| Acknowledgement|| |
The authors are grateful for assistance received from resident radiographers in the three hospitals, the children and their parents, as well as the technical staff of FRPS, Ibadan.
| References|| |
|1.||International Commission for Radiological Protection, 1990. Recommendations of the ICRP on Radiological Protection, Publication 60. Pergamon Press: Oxford and New York; 1991. |
|2.||Radiological Protection and Safety in Medicine. International Commission for Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 73. Pergamon Press: Oxford and New York; 1996. |
|3.||Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, International Atomic Energy Agency, International Labour Organisation, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, PAN American Health Organisation, WHO: International Basic Safety Standards for Protection against Ionizing Radiation and for the safety of Radiation sources. Safety Series, No. 115, IAEA: Vienna; 1996. |
|4.||National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB). 'Patient Dose reduction in diagnostic Radiology'. Document of the NRPB, Vol 1 No. 3. NRPB: Chilton; 1990. |
|5.||National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB). Guidelines on Patient Dose to promote the Optimization of Protection for Diagnostic Medical Exposures, Vol. 10, 1999. p. 1. |
|6.||International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiation Doses in Diagnostic Radiology and Methods for Dose Reduction. IAEA-TECDOC - 796, Vienna; 1995. |
|7.||Nigerian Nuclear Regulatory Authority. Nigerian Radiation Safety Regulation for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Practice. 2003. |
|8.||Wade JP, Goldstone KE, Dendy PP. Patient dose measurement and dose reduction in east anglia (UK). Radiat Prot Dosim 1995;57:445-8. |
|9.||Geleijns J, Broerse JJ, van Vliet M, Lopez M, Zonderland HM. Assessment of effective dose in paediatric radiology: A survey at 14 Dutch hospitals. Radiat Prot Dosim 2000;90:135-40. |
|10.||Gogos KA, Yakoumakis EN, Tsalafoutas IA, Makri TK. Radiation dose considerations in common paediatric X-ray examinations. Pediatr Radiol 2003;33:236-40. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|11.||Freitas MB, Yoshimura EM. Dose measurements in chest diagnostic X-rays: Adult and paediatric patients. Radiat Prot Dosim 2004;111:73-6. |
|12.||Compagnone G, Pagan L, Bergamini C. Local diagnostic reference levels in standard X-ray examinations. Radiat Prot Dosim 2005;113:54-63. |
|13.||Azevedo AC, Osibote OA, Boehat MC. Paediatric X-ray examinations in Rio de Janeiro. Phys Med Biol 2006;51:3723-32. |
|14.||Don S. Radiosensitivity of children: Potential for overexposure in CR and DR and magnitude of doses in ordinary radiographic examinations. Pediatr Radiol 2004;34:S167-72. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|15.||Roebuck DJ. Risk and benefit in paediatric radiology. Pediatr Radiol 1999;29:637-40. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|16.||Ajayi IR, Akinwumiju A. Measurement of entrance surface dose to patients in four common diagnostic examinations by thermoluminescence dosimetry in Nigeria. Radiat Prot Dosim 2000;87:217-20. |
|17.||Ogunseyinde AO, Adeniran SA, Obed RI, Akinlade BI, Ogundare FO. Comparison of entrance surface doses of some X-ray examinations with CEC reference doses. Radiat Prot Dosim 2002;98:231-4. |
|18.||Ogundare FO, Uche CZ, Balogun FA. Radiological parameters and radiation doses of patients undergoing abdomen, pelvis and lumbar spine X-ray examinations in three Nigerian hospitals. Br J Radiol 2004;77:934-40. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|19.||Ogundare FO, Ajibola CL, Balogun FA. Survey of techniques and doses of children undergoing some common X-ray examinations in three hospitals in Nigeria. Med Phys 2004;31:521-4. [PUBMED] |
|20.||UNSCEAR, "Sources and Effects of ionizing radiation," United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes, vol. 1, 2000. |
|21.||Mohammadain KE, da Rossa LA, Azevedo AC, Guebel MR, Beochat MC, Habani F. Dose evaluation for paediatric chest examinations in Brazil and Sudan: Low doses and reliable examinations can be achieved in developing countries. Phys Med Biol 2004;49:1017-31. |
|22.||International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Optimization of the radiological protection of patients undergoing radiography, fluoroscopy and computed tomography. Final report of a co-ordinated research project in Africa, Asia and eastern Europe. IAEA-TECDOC-1423. 2004. |
[Figure - 1]
[Table - 1], [Table - 2], [Table - 3], [Table - 4], [Table - 5]
|This article has been cited by|
||STATUS OF RADIATION DOSE LEVELS IN PAEDIATRIC CHEST RADIOGRAPHY IN A TERTIARY HOSPITAL IN GHANA
| ||Samuel Anim-Sampong, Lawrence Arthur, Enock Boahen, Benard Ohene Botwe |
| ||Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2021; 195(2): 75 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Estimation of dose and cancer risk to newborn from chest X-ray in South-South Nigeria: a call for protocol optimization
| ||Akintayo Daniel Omojola, Michael Onoriode Akpochafor, Samuel Olaolu Adeneye, Isiaka Olusola Akala, Azuka Anthonio Agboje |
| ||Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2021; 52(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
|| Good radiographic practice: The Nigerian experience and the CEC recommendations
| ||Egbe, N.O., Inah, G.B., Azogor, W.E., Chiaghanam, N.O., Ikamaise, V.C. |
| ||European Journal of Radiography. 2009; 1(4): 147-150 |