Journal of Medical Physics
 Home | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscription | Login  The official journal of Association of Medical Physicists of India      
 Users online: 129  Home  EMail this page Print this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size 


 
INVITED PAPER
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 34  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 133-136
 

The role of Cobalt-60 in modern radiation therapy: Dose delivery and image guidance


1 Department of Medical Physics, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario (CCSEO); Departments of Oncology and Physics, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
2 Departments of Oncology and Physics, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada

Date of Submission23-Jan-2009
Date of Decision23-Mar-2009
Date of Acceptance11-Apr-2009
Date of Web Publication3-Aug-2009

Correspondence Address:
L John Schreiner
Department of Medical Physics, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston General Hospital, 25 King Street West, Kingston, Ontario K7L 5P9
Canada
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.54846

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 

The advances in modern radiation therapy with techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy and image-guid­ed radiation therapy (IMRT and IGRT) have been limited almost exclusively to linear accel­erators. Investigations of modern Cobalt-60 (Co-60) radiation delivery in the context of IMRT and IGRT have been very sparse, and have been limited mainly to computer-modeling and treatment-planning exercises. In this paper, we report on the results of experiments using a tomotherapy benchtop apparatus attached to a conventional Co-60 unit. We show that conformal dose delivery is possible and also that Co-60 can be used as the radiation source in megavoltage computed tomography imaging. These results complement our modeling studies of Co-60 tomotherapy and provide a strong motivation for continuing development of modern Cobalt-60 treatment devices.


Keywords: Cobalt-60, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, image guidance, megavoltage computed tomography, tomotherapy


How to cite this article:
Schreiner L J, Joshi CP, Darko J, Kerr A, Salomons G, Dhanesar S. The role of Cobalt-60 in modern radiation therapy: Dose delivery and image guidance. J Med Phys 2009;34:133-6

How to cite this URL:
Schreiner L J, Joshi CP, Darko J, Kerr A, Salomons G, Dhanesar S. The role of Cobalt-60 in modern radiation therapy: Dose delivery and image guidance. J Med Phys [serial online] 2009 [cited 2017 Mar 24];34:133-6. Available from: http://www.jmp.org.in/text.asp?2009/34/3/133/54846



   Introduction Top


Modern radiation therapy is moving towards advanced conformal techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in conjunction with image guid­ance, bringing about image-guid­ed radiation therapy (IGRT), to ensure accurate patient treat­ment. The clinical application of these advanced techniques has been limited almost exclusively to linear accel­erators. Investigations of conformal Cobalt-60 (Co-60) radiation delivery have been sparse, in part because of preconceived notions that the radiation beams from Co-60 do not have the properties required in modern radiation treatment. [1] There have been a number of modeling studies that have suggested that Co-60 may be more effective in modern radiation therapy than perceived in the past. [2],[3],[4] However, aside from a limited number of studies, there has been little experimental validation of Co-60 conformal delivery. [5] Furthermore, while computed tomography imaging with Co-60 has been performed for basic medical physics studies, [6],[7] there has been very little work done on the evaluation of the potential for image guidance with Co-60.

This report will review the results of experimental investigations of the potential of Co-60-based IGRT via tomotherapy - a rotational implement­ation of IMRT. [5],[8] Measured conformal dose distributions achieved with an in-house Co-60 tomotherapy benchtop apparatus will be compared to the corresponding treatment plans. The results of investigations of Co-60 megavoltage com­puted tomogra­phy (MVCT) for image guidance [5],[6] will also be shown. The findings of this work support the fact that there is ample potential for administering modern radiation therapy with a cobalt unit and encourage further investigations and development.


   Materials and Methods Top


All irradiations were performed on a Co-60 T780C unit (Best-Theratronics, Kanata, Canada) modified by the addition of a purpose-built computer-controlled rotate translate benchtop apparatus, as shown in [Figure 1]a. This first-generation tomotherapy test bed includes a rotate translate stage, which can move a phantom to be irradiated through a 1×1 cm 2 Co-60 pencil beam. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy is performed in a single slice by varying the velocity of the phantom as it moves through the pencil beam. By this simple approach, we are well able to imitate the beam delivery from a NOMOS MIMiC multileaf collimator (BEST nomos, Pittsburg, PA, USA, formerly NOMOS Corp., Swickley, PA). It is possible to extend this delivery to 3D by adding a translate capability to the height of the table. Quantitative 3D delivery has been achieved in our laboratory, but the quantitative work reported here will be limited to two dimensions only. The test irradiations were performed on a cylindrical phantom containing GafChromic film (International Specialty Products, NJ, USA). Treatment planning was performed using an in-house developed inverse treatment planning system [9],[10] that used either measured pencil beam data in an empirical Milan-Bentley-type algorithm [11] (simple phantom geometries) or EGSnrc/BEAMnrc [12] and EGSnrc/DOSXYZnrc [13] Monte Carlo simulations to model the beam delivery in patient CT data.

The in-house tomotherapy apparatus described above can also be used to perform fan-beam and cone-beam MVCT measurements. Our initial MVCT investigations were based on first-generation (using a pencil beam and diode detector with the image phantom translated through the beam to achieve one projection) and second-generation (using a fan beam and scanning diode) prototype Co-60 tomotherapy imaging systems. Recently our imaging studies have advanced with the development of a third-generation imaging system using a Varian PortalVision LC250 scanning liquid ionization chamber (SLIC) electronic portal imaging device (EPID) (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA), shown in [Figure 1]b. In the Co-60 MVCT experiments, the phantom to be imaged was rotated on the central turntable; typically 180 and 451 image projections were taken through 360 degrees for the diode and SLIC experiments, respectively. The image reconstruction was based on parallel-beam filtered back-projection for diode-based imaging and a generalized Feldkamp technique [14] for EPID fan-beam imaging and was performed using in-house software written in Matlab (The Mathworks, Natick, MA) platform. Anthropomorphic head phantoms, a variety of orthopedic implants, and QA phantoms containing plugs of known electron density were used for qualitative and quantitative assessments.


   Results Top


The findings to date confirm the viability of Co-60-based tomotherapy for conformal dose delivery. [Figure 2] shows two examples of conformal irradiations planned for the delivery with the in-house cylindrical treatment phantom - a ring pattern [Figure 2]a and a standard conformal avoidance 'C' plan [Figure 2]b. These plans were implemented to determine whether the inverse treatment planning system would be able to generate an optimized and accurate dose distribution for simple but challenging geometry, including the ability to protect the central critical structure from unwanted radiation.

The ring in [Figure 2]a represents the PTV region and was prescribed an arbitrary dose of 200 cGy. The dose to the OAR (central structure) was limited to less than 60 cGy. The rest of the volume represents normal tissue (commonly known as the external region), and the dose to this region was restricted to less than 200 cGy. Using the in-house inverse treatment planning program based on aggressive active set (AAS) conjugate gradient method, [9] the plan was generated using 50 field orientations where each orientation used 31 beamlets to provide intensity modulation. The number of beamlets in our system represents the individual pencil beams being projected by the 31 leaf pairs of a multileaf collimator. Therefore, our configuration for field orientations and beamlets is similar to that typically used in commercial tomotherapy. The middle figure in [Figure 2]a shows the GafChromic film irradiation, which resembles the plan reasonably well. The bottom figure in [Figure 2]a shows a gamma map [15] of the simulated- and delivered-dose distributions. A gamma value less than or equal to 1 suggests that the agreement between delivery and simulation is within the specified criteria [15] : a standard clinical criterion allows a difference of up to 3% in dose and 3 mm in distance. The gamma comparison of the ring pattern showed that 87% of the treatment volume satisfied the 3%, 3 mm gamma criteria. In clinical practice, the goal is to have 95% of the volume satisfy the gamma criteria. Further analysis showed that 95% of the volume satisfies the gamma criteria if the criteria are 5% and 5 mm, and this is clearly illustrated by the gamma map shown in [Figure 2]a.

[Figure 2]b shows a similar plan of an exaggerated concave 'C' structure (the PTV) with an OAR at the center. This plan was generated using a similar number of beam orientations with a dose of 250 cGy to the PTV region and a maximum dose of 100 cGy to the OAR. The delivery was successful, as shown by the middle figure in [Figure 2]b. The gamma map analysis indicated that the plan and the delivery were in agreement with each other when using the gamma criteria of 5% dose difference and 5 mm distance difference and satisfied the 95% volume requirement.

Various treatment plans of similar complexity have been achieved and validated with the GafChromic film measurements. [16] These include simple conformal tests such as a star pattern, a circle, a 'K' pattern and some sophisticated experiments such as the common avoidance 'C' test and a simple head-and-neck test. All measurements showed good agreement with the corresponding plans, indicating that it is possible to deliver Co-60-based tomotherapy irradiations.

Imaging studies have been performed on a number of anthropomorphic phantoms using both a first-generation approach and a third-generation approach using the Varian PortalVision LC250 EPID imager [Figure 1]b. The resulting images illustrate that the Co-60 MVCT scanner performance is, 3 mm high-contrast spatial resolution and 2.8% low-contrast sensitivity (2.5-cm diameter objects). The image in [Figure 3]a shows one of the early torso images taken using our first-generation approach with a translated/rotated pencil beam and diode detector. [Figure 3]b shows a third-generation image of a head-and-neck phantom containing three stainless steel pins. The top right image in [Figure 3]b is of the same phantom obtained with kVCT and clearly shows the image-degrading artifacts associated with the metal pins. These artifacts are absent in the MVCT images shown below in [Figure 3]. Gross features prominent in the MVCT image include the occipital bone, posteria fosa, temporal bone, maxillary antrum, zygomatic bone, air hole for TLD, and nasal septum.


   Discussion Top


In this paper, we demonstrate that Cobalt-60-based tomotherapy approach is capable of both highly conformal intensity-modulated dose deliveries and viable image guidance. While it may seem that the addition of more complex beam collimation and megavoltage imaging to cobalt may complicate a simple technology, and perhaps make the device too complicated or expensive for worldwide distribution, we believe that it is important to establish full modern radiation therapy with a cobalt unit. It is quite clear that in the coming decade, the standard of care for radiation therapy will require image guidance and that radiation units incapable of imaging at the time of delivery will no longer be used in clinics. The development of tomotherapy type approaches with Co-60 also indicates that the potential for use of more sophisticated machines as proposed by Kron et al. incorporating MRI [17] may also translate into actual practice. We believe that there are considerable clinical and economic advantages in further investigating modern delivery with Co-60.


   Conclusions Top


Our experiments have confirmed the results of our previous modeling studies that Cobalt-60-based tomotherapy is clinically viable. Two-dimensional conformal dose delivery in a single slice with Co-60 has been validated experimentally using radiochromic film dosimetry. We have successfully developed Co-60 MVCT imaging techniques which provide adequate image quality required for IGRT. We believe that these results clearly indicate that undertaking the task of further development and implementation of modern radiation techniques based on Co-60 units is fully warranted.


   Acknowledgments Top


We thank the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR), Ontario Research Development Challenge Fund (OCITS/ORDCF), Kingston General Hospital (KGH), and the CCSEO for research funding; and NOMOS and MDS Nordion for equipment support. The authors would like to thank Chris Peters for his Co-60-CT assistance with the SLIC imager.

 
   References Top

1.VanDyk J and Battista JJ. Cobalt-60: An old modality, a renewed challenge. Current Oncology 1996;3:8-17.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Cadman P. An investigation of beam parameters for Co-60 tomotherapy. Med Phys 2007;34:3838-43.   Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Fox C, Romeijn HE, Lynch B, Men C, Aleman DM, Dempsey JF. Comparative analysis of 60 Co intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2008;53;3175-88.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Joshi CP, Darko J, Vidyasagar PB, Schreiner LJ. Investigation of an efficient source design for Cobalt-60 based tomotherapy using EGSnrc Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Med Biol 2008;53:575-92.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Schreiner LJ, Kerr AT, Salomons GJ, Dyck C and Hajdok G. The Potential for Image Guided Radiation Therapy with Cobalt-60 Tomotherapy. Proc. of 6 th Annual on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention, Springer; Heidelberg, Germany: 2003. p. 449-56.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Rogers MV, Kerr AT, Salomons GJ and Schreiner LJ. Quantitative Investigations of Megavoltage Computed Tomography. Proc. of SPIE: Physics of Medical Imaging, M.J. Flynn (ed) International Society for Optical Engineering: Bellingham, WA, 5745; 2005. p. 685-94.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Monajemi TT, Tu D, Fallone BG, Rathee S. A bench-top megavoltage fan-beam CT using CdWO 4 -photodiode detectors. II. Image performance evaluation. Med Phys 2006;33:1090-100.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Mackie TR, Holmes T, Swerdloff S, Reckwerdt P, Deasy JO, Yang J, et al . Tomotherapy: A new concept for the delivery of conformal radiotherapy. Med Phys 1993;20:1709-19.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Chng N, Kerr AT, Rogers M,, Schreiner LJ. Development of Inverse Planning and Limited Angle CT Reconstruction for Cobalt-60 Tomotherapy. Proc. of 51st Annual Scientific Meeting of Canadian Organization of Medical Physicists (COMP) and Canadian College of Physicist in Medicine (CCPM), Hamilton, Canada (Hamilton, ON: COMP and CCPM), 2005. p. 235-37.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Dhanesar SK, M.Sc. Thesis, An Investigation of Megavoltage Computed Tomography Using a Radioactive Cobalt-60 Gamma Ray Source for Radiation Therapy Treatment Verification, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, 2002.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Milan J, Bentley RE. The Storage and manipulation of radiation dose data in a small digital computer. Br J Radiol 1974;47:115-21.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Rogers DW, Faddegon BA, Ding GX, Ma CM, We J, Mackie TR. BEAM: A Monte Carlo code to simulate radiotherapy treatment units. Med Phys 1995;22:503-24.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Walters B, Kawrakow I and Rogers DWO. DOSXYZnrc Users Manual NRCC Report PIRS-794revB, Ionizing Radiation Standards, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa. 2005.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Feldkamp LA, Davis LC, and Kress JW. Practical cone beam algorithm. J Opt Soc Amer. A1, 612-619, 1984.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Low DA, Harms WB, Mutic S, Purdy JA. A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. Med Phys 1998;25:656-61.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Dhanesar SK, Chng N, Rogers M, Joshi CP, Darko J, Salomons G, Kerr A, Schreiner LJ. Experimental Validation of a Conjugant Gradient based Inverse Treatment Planning System for Cobalt-60 Tomotherapy. Radiother Oncol 84:S21;2007.  Back to cited text no. 16    
17.Kron T, Eyles D, Schreiner LJ, Battista J. Magnetic resonance imaging for adaptive cobalt tomotherapy: A Proposal. J Med Phys 2006;31;242-52.  Back to cited text no. 17    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]


This article has been cited by
1 Cancer research in India: national priorities, global results
Richard Sullivan,Rajendra A Badwe,Goura K Rath,C S Pramesh,V Shanta,Raghunadharao Digumarti,Anil DæCruz,Suresh C Sharma,Lokesh Viswanath,Arun Shet,Manavalan Vijayakumar,Grant Lewison,Mammen Chandy,Priyadarshini Kulkarni,M R Bardia,Shaleen Kumar,Rajiv Sarin,Paul Sebastian,Preet K Dhillon,Preetha Rajaraman,Edward L Trimble,Ajay Aggarwal,D K Vijaykumar,Arnie D Purushotham
The Lancet Oncology. 2014; 15(6): e213
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Monte Carlo simulation based study of a proposed multileaf collimator for a telecobalt machine
Sahani, G. and Dutt Sharma, S. and Dash Sharma, P.K. and Sharma, D.N. and Hussain, S.A.
Medical Physics. 2013; 40(2)
[Pubmed]
3 Application of a pencil ionization chamber (0.34 cm3 volume) for 60Co beams: Experimental and monte carlo results
Neves, L.P. and Perini, A.P. and Fernandez-Varea, J.M. and Caldas, L.V.E.
IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 2013; 60(2): 746-750
[Pubmed]
4 Monte Carlo simulation based study of a proposed multileaf collimator for a telecobalt machine
G. Sahani,Sunil Dutt Sharma,P. K. Dash Sharma,D. N. Sharma,S. A. Hussain
Medical Physics. 2013; 40(2): 021705
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Cobalt-60 tomotherapy: Clinical treatment planning and phantom dose delivery studies
Sandeep Dhanesar,Johnson Darko,Chandra P. Joshi,Andrew Kerr,L. John Schreiner
Medical Physics. 2013; 40(8): 081710
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Investigation Of Photon Shielding Property Changes in Curing High Density Concrete
Matthew B. Marsh,Christopher Peters,Nicholas Rawluk,L. John Schreiner
Health Physics. 2013; 105(4): 318
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Aperture superposition dose model versus pencil beam superposition dose model for a finite size Cobalt-60 source for tomotherapy deliveries
Sandeep Dhanesar, Johnson Darko, L. John Schreiner
Medical Physics. 2012; 39(1): 206
[VIEW] | [DOI]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

 
   Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (716 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Introduction
    Materials and Me...
    Results
    Discussion
    Conclusions
    Acknowledgments
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed9031    
    Printed174    
    Emailed8    
    PDF Downloaded341    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 7    

Recommend this journal